Justice process must unite, not divide Tanzanians
DAR ES SALAAM: AT a time when national healing and accountability are paramount, there is a growing risk that a critical institution meant to unify the country could instead be drawn into political contestation.
The establishment of an independent commission of inquiry following unrest during and after last year’s General Election is not an opportunity for political actors or self-styled activists to score points; it is a moment that demands restraint, responsibility and commitment to the greater national good.
This commission represents far more than a routine investigation. It reflects a nation demonstrating confidence in its institutions, legal frameworks and its ability to confront sensitive issues transparently without external interference.
That alone should inspire collective pride, not political opportunism. The existence of such a body signals institutional maturity.
It shows the country has the internal capacity to examine itself, listen to its citizens and pursue accountability through established mechanisms.
Undermining this process through politicisation risks eroding public trust and weakening institutions meant to safeguard justice and stability.
Equally important is the commission’s independence. Its work is guided not by political interests or external pressure, but by legal principles grounded in both domestic and international standards.
This ensures its findings will meet national expectations while aligning with globally recognised benchmarks of justice and fairness.
Attempts to influence or discredit the process for political gain would be both irresponsible and damaging. The commission’s composition further reinforces its credibility.
It brings together experienced professionals with local knowledge and international exposure, supported by technical experts capable of handling complex digital and forensic evidence.
This is not a symbolic exercise, but a serious and methodical effort to uncover truth.
The process has also been inclusive. It has engaged victims, families of the deceased and those affected by the unrest, collecting evidence through testimonies and sworn statements.
This broad participation reflects public trust and a willingness among citizens to contribute to truth and reconciliation. That trust must not be undermined by efforts to distort the process for narrow interests.
For that matter, the extension of the commission’s timeline should be understood in this light. It is not a sign of inefficiency, but of depth.
The volume of public submissions and the need for thorough forensic analysis require time. Rushing the process would compromise its integrity; allowing sufficient time strengthens its outcomes.
What the country needs now is not noise, but patience; not division, but dialogue; not suspicion, but trust. The findings, when presented, should provide a basis for reflection, accountability and reconciliation.
