Invisible drought, visible danger: East Africa’s dry rot

DAR ES SALAAM: IN a region built on rivers and growth, water has transitioned from a utility to a scarce commodity. While global attention typically fixes on the permanent climate emergencies of Somalia and Ethiopia, February 2026 has seen the crisis spill into the productive core of East Africa.

Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, Burundi and Rwanda are now facing a “structural squeeze”, a slow economic suffocation rather than a sudden famine. As rivers thin and soil hardens, the entire growth corridor is undergoing a hydrological stress test that exposes the fragility of it s progress.

The clearest signal comes not from a remote village, but from Dar es Salaam, Tanzania’s commercial spine. The city depends heavily on the Ruvu River to supply homes, hospitals, factories, ports and markets. When water levels dropped sharply in early February, rationing followed.

Supply now arrives unpredictably. Some neighbourhoods receive water for a few hours. Others wake to dry pipes by midday. For wealthier households, this is inconvenience. For informal settlements and small businesses, it is economic shock as water inflation behaves like a tax on survival. It pulls cash out of the local economy and freezes micro-enterprises that live on thin margins: Food stalls, car washes, tailoring shops, guesthouses, small manufacturers. Productivity falls quietly before any statistic captures it.

ALSO READ: Why are Tanzanian farmers poor?

Tanzania’s economy remains deeply weather-sensitive. Agriculture still contributes close to a third of GDP and employs roughly half the population, most of it rain-fed. When water fails in the city, it links directly to food prices, health costs, labour output and port operations. Delayed cargo, sick workers and shuttered workshops eat into national output long before economists notice.

Across the border in Kenya, the drought wears a different face. Nairobi’s water tables are under strain, but the sharper impact is rural. In northern and eastern counties, pasture has receded and boreholes are over-used. Livestock markets are thinning. Smallholders who rely on the short rains have delayed planting or contemplating abandoning fields altogether.

Kenya’s food inflation is already sensitive to weather, and as maize and livestock supply tighten, urban consumers feel the pressure through higher prices and shrinking household purchasing power. The drought is quietly transmitting itself from arid counties into supermarkets and wage negotiations in the capital.

If Tanzania and Kenya show what drought does to cities and markets, Uganda’s Karamoja region shows what it does to mobility and peace. In Karamoja, pasture and water have shrunk faster than livestock populations. Dams and boreholes are under pressure far beyond their design.

As grazing lands disappear, herders do not simply wait. They walk. Tens of thousands of cattle are now funneling toward the few remaining water points, including Kobebe Dam near Moroto.

Some herders leave before sunrise, pushing skeletal cattle past abandoned kraals, unsure whether the next stop holds water or only cracked mud. Many are trekking over a hundred kilometers into neighboring districts in search of survival. This movement is no longer traditional migration guided by seasons. It is climate displacement driven by failing infrastructure. Where animals go, people follow.

Where people follow, boundaries blur. Competition over wells, crops and land intensifies. Markets fracture. Traders avoid routes. Prices climb. Livestock in Karamoja is not just food; it is capital, insurance and identity. When cattle die, wealth evaporates. When herders clash, insecurity spreads. And when insecurity spreads, governments divert money into policing and emergency relief.

What begins as drought quietly transforms into a fiscal and political problem. Move northeast and the pattern deepens. In Somalia, drought is no longer episodic, it is structural. Rangelands in central and southern regions have deteriorated after successive weak rainy seasons. Livestock mortality is rising, and pastoralists are clustering around shrinking water corridors.

Urban centres like Mogadishu absorb migrants who arrive with no assets and few jobs. Food prices rise, remittances stretch thinner and humanitarian budgets compete with security spending. Somalia’s economy, already fragile, becomes more exposed every time rainfall fails to reset the system.

Ethiopia faces a dual squeeze. In the lowlands, pastoral zones struggle with water scarcity and livestock disease as grazing deteriorates. In the highlands, farmers delay planting because soil moisture never arrives on time.

Ethiopia’s growth model depends heavily on agricultural surplus feeding industry and exports. When harvests weaken, factories receive less raw material, foreign exchange tightens and public finances absorb shock after shock. Drought there does not just hurt farmers; it bends the entire macroeconomic framework.

Further north, Eritrea and Djibouti feel drought differently but no less dangerously. Eritrea’s largely subsistence farming base suffers when short rains fail, reducing food availability and increasing import dependence. Djibouti, almost entirely urban and import-reliant, absorbs drought through price channels.

When regional supply tightens, Djibouti imports become more expensive, household costs climb and logistics chains strain under higher fuel and food bills. In both cases, water scarcity turns into fiscal stress faster than rainfall statistics suggest.

South Sudan, still healing from conflict, confronts drought layered onto institutional fragility. Pastoral communities move farther with their herds, sometimes crossing borders, sometimes clashing locally. Crop zones dependent on river flooding and seasonal rain see reduced yields.

When food production weakens, humanitarian needs grow, while state capacity to respond remains thin. Drought there is not only environmental, it threatens social stability. Where Uganda’s drought moves animals, Burundi’s drought erases harvests.

Burundi relies heavily on two agricultural seasons. Recent moisture stress disrupted planting and growth across large parts of the north and east. Beans and maize staples for millions failed to mature properly. Losses are severe enough that national food buffers for the coming months have effectively been wiped out.

Rwanda offers contrast, not escape. Insurance and risk management cushion some farmers, but soil moisture deficits still delay planting windows. Rwanda’s progress depends on rural productivity and human capital. When weather shocks interrupt schooling, nutrition and labour participation, the effects compound over years, not months.

This drought’s danger lies in its collision with regional optimism. While forecasts project robust growth, the crisis functions as a “survival tax” on development, leaking into national budgets as governments divert funds from infrastructure and power to emergency water trucking and food subsidies.

This “opportunity cost” slows growth and increases debt through less productive spending. The economic contagion spreads rapidly: Livestock lose value, crop processors operate below capacity and export earnings wobble as banks pull back from agricultural lending.

At the core is a shared vulnerability: East Africa still runs on rain. With over two-thirds of smallholders dependent on rainfall and irrigation coverage limited, the failure of the late 2025 rains left soils dry and rivers receded long before the 2026 planting began. Relying on the hope of “long rains” is a dangerous gamble.

One good season cannot fix a structural exposure where urban and rural systems remain hostage to atmospheric mood swings. Policy must move beyond pilots. Groundwater, urban storage, irrigation and insurance need immediate scaling.

This drought is dry rot, a quiet erosion of growth and stability. East Africa’s rise is real, but without water security, it rests not on strategy, but on clouds. Invisible drought, visible danger: East Africa’s dry rot T HE rise of Islamic finance has been a notable development in the global financial ecosystem, providing an alternative to conventional banking that aligns with the ethical and moral values of Shariah principles.

Islamic finance, which prohibits interest (riba) and speculation (gharar) and promotes profit-and-loss sharing, has expanded across Muslim-majority countries and non-Muslim countries alike. With the global Islamic finance market valued at approximately 4.5 trillion US dollars and projected to grow to 6.7 trillion US dollars by 2027, this segment shows no signs of slowing down.

The Islamic capital markets, a crucial part of this growth, offer Shariah-compliant financial instruments and have attracted both Muslim and non-Muslim investors, resulting in widespread adoption. The global Islamic finance industry has seen exponential growth, particularly over the last two decades.

The industry has grown at an average rate of 10-12 per cent annually, with countries in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region, Southeast Asia and parts of Africa at the forefront of this expansion. Leading growing markets include; Saudi Arabia: As the largest economy in the GCC, Saudi Arabia leads with a robust Islamic finance sector, representing 28 per cent of the global Islamic banking assets.

ALSO READ: Strong quarter three fuels positive growth outlook

Islamic finance aligns closely with Vision 2030, the Kingdom’s economic diversification programme, which has spurred significant investments in Shariah compliant projects. Malaysia: Malaysia has consistently ranked among the top in Islamic finance, holding around 25 per cent of global Islamic assets. It has developed a well regulated and mature Islamic capital market, offering a range of Sukuk (Islamic bonds) and equity products.

The country has over 290 billion US dollars in Islamic banking assets and is a global leader in Islamic finance education, research and development. United Arab Emirates (UAE): The UAE holds a strong position in the Islamic finance industry, particularly in Dubai, which is branded as the Islamic economic hub.

The country’s Islamic banking assets stand at over 170 billion US dollars and the UAE is home to prominent Islamic banks like Dubai Islamic Bank and Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank. Indonesia: With the largest Muslim population in the world, Indonesia has been progressively enhancing its Islamic finance sector, achieving a 6.0 per cent market share of total banking assets in 2022.

With an estimated 70 billion US dollars in Islamic finance assets, Indonesia is accelerating its adaptation by introducing favorable policies and initiatives. Qatar and Kuwait: Both countries also contribute significantly to the Islamic finance market, especially in Sukuk issuance and Islamic banking, contributing around 15 per cent of the GCC’s total Islamic banking assets. United Kingdom and the United States: Although non-Muslim majority nations, both the UK and the US have made strides in Islamic finance.

The UK, which issued the first sovereign Sukuk in Europe in 2014, now has five fully Shariah-compliant banks and an active Islamic finance infrastructure. The growing adaptation of Islamic finance is based on a number of reasons.

The most crucial reason is its ethical and moral appeal. Islamic finance is based on ethical principles, aligning with a growing trend of socially responsible and sustainable investing (SRI). Islamic finance prohibits investments in certain sectors (such as alcohol, gambling and weapons), which attracts investors seeking ethical investment opportunities. This moral grounding has led to collaborations between Islamic finance institutions and Western financial institutions aiming to cater to a more ethically conscious clientele.

Another reason is the resilience in economic crises. Islamic finance has shown resilience during financial crises. For example, during the 2008 financial crisis, Islamic banks demonstrated greater stability due to their asset-backed structure and prohibition on speculative investments.

As a result, conventional financial institutions and governments started recognising Islamic finance as a stable alternative.

Additionally, the subsector’s synergy with ESG is appealing to global investors. Islamic finance and ESG share a natural synergy. Islamic finance’s ethical principles align well with ESG criteria, which has led to the development of Islamic ESG funds. The Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) has issued green Sukuk for sustainable energy projects and Malaysia has introduced guidelines for green Sukuk.

This convergence has made Islamic finance appealing to non-Muslim investors interested in impact investing. Moreover, with over 1.9 billion Muslims worldwide, demand for Shariah compliant financial services is substantial. The rapid population growth in Muslim-majority countries coupled with increasing awareness of Islamic financial services has led to a surge in demand.

By 2030, Muslims are expected to constitute 26 per cent of the world’s population, driving further growth in this sector. Despite recorded notable growth, Islamic finance faces a number of challenges including a lack of standardisation, limited products and limited awareness.

A lack of standardisation across jurisdictions remains a major challenge for Islamic finance. Different interpretations of Shariah law led to discrepancies in product structures and compliance requirements. This fragmentation increases costs and complicates cross-border transactions.

Organisations like the Accounting and Auditing Organisation for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI) and the Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB) have made efforts to establish uniform standards, but further global collaboration is needed. Limited product offering is another challenge facing the subsector.

Compared to conventional finance, Islamic finance offers limited product diversity, especially in retail and wealth management services. This limitation can restrict the sector’s competitiveness and deters non-Muslim investors from participating fully. As Islamic finance expands, developing more diversified and innovative products will be essential.

Moreover, due to additional requirements, Islamic finance products tend to incur relatively higher compliance costs. The need for Shariah-compliance certification, coupled with additional compliance checks, can increase the cost of Islamic financial products. In competitive markets, these costs may render Islamic finance products less attractive than conventional ones.

However, digital transformation and automation are expected to lower these costs over time. Another major challenge is the perception and lack of awareness.

ALSO READ: CRDB, NMB lead banking growth

Non-Muslim markets often have limited awareness of Islamic finance and misconceptions about its restrictions and benefits. Many non-Muslim investors and institutions are unfamiliar with the stability and ethical appeal of Islamic finance, which can limit its expansion in Western markets. Despite the challenges, the future of Islamic finance is promising with expansion into emerging markets.

Emerging markets in Africa, Central Asia and Southeast Asia present a promising growth avenue for Islamic finance. Countries like Nigeria, Kenya and Kazakhstan have Muslim populations eager for Shariah-compliant options and are enacting regulations to promote Islamic finance. Sub-Saharan Africa alone has an untapped market potential estimated at over 2 trillion US dollars.

Furthermore, Islamic social finance mechanisms, such as zakat (charity) and waqf (endowment), present opportunities for addressing global challenges like poverty, healthcare and education. The pandemic highlighted the need for resilient financing and integrating Islamic social finance into the broader financial system could provide sustainable development funding.

IN the shadow of escalating financing costs, Tanzanian banks are creatively navigating the waters of capital acquisition. DCB Commercial Bank Plc and Azania Bank Plc, two stalwarts in the Tanzanian financial sector, are each pioneering distinct pathways through the capital markets to secure the necessary funds.

This move is a strategic shift from traditional deposit-driven funding mechanisms that have become increasingly expensive, reflecting a broader, perhaps transformative trend in the country’s banking finance landscape. DCB recently unveiled its plan to raise 10.74bn/- through a rights issue, offering existing shareholders 97,646,913 new shares at 110/- each.

This decision is emblematic of a deeper commitment to fostering shareholder loyalty and ensuring financial stability. A rights issue, particularly in the context of a tightening financial environment, serves as a testament to the bank’s proactive approach to capital management. It empowers existing shareholders to bolster their investment at a fixed, preferential rate, potentially positioning them to benefit from the bank’s future growth without the dilutive effects typically associated with additional equity influxes.

This move could be seen as a win win. Shareholders get a chance to deepen their stakes under advantageous conditions, securing their confidence and support for DCB’s strategic direction.

For DCB, this approach not only enhances its capital adequacy—vital for future expansions and navigating economic fluctuations—but also solidifies its balance sheet in a way that debt financing simply cannot match. On another front, Azania Bank is reaching out to the broader capital market with the issuance of a 30bn/- corporate bond, with the flexibility to increase to 45bn/-, depending on the market’s response.

This bond, part of a larger 100bn/- medium-term note programme, offers a 12.5 per cent annual interest rate, disbursed quarterly. This structure is particularly appealing in today’s volatile market, providing a beacon of stability with fixed, predictable returns.

From an investor’s perspective, Azania’s bond is a compelling proposition. It promises regular income returns in a market where such guarantees are few and far between, appealing especially to those who prefer lower-risk investments.

For income-focused investors, this could be a strategic addition to their portfolios, offering both security and satisfactory yields. For Azania, this bond issuance is more than just a fundraising exercise; it’s a strategic lever to diversify funding sources and enhance financial flexibility. The capital raised will be earmarked for various strategic initiatives that align with the bank’s long-term goals, potentially fueling sustainable growth and operational resilience.

The initiatives by DCB and Azania are indicative of a larger shift within the Tanzanian banking sector—a pivot towards more innovative and diverse financing strategies. This trend is not just about overcoming the immediate challenges of costly financing but is also about setting a foundation for more robust financial.