Africa Questions WTO Fairness

ADDIS ABABA: African policymakers and trade analysts are raising concerns over whether current global trade rules adequately support the continent’s development, as debates intensify ahead of key negotiations at the World Trade Organization (WTO).

At the center of the discussion is a growing perception that the global trading system, while framed as rules-based and neutral, continues to produce uneven outcomes between developed and developing economies. For many African countries, the concern is less about participation in global trade and more about the terms under which that participation occurs.

Agriculture remains one of the most contested areas. While WTO frameworks promote market liberalization, major economies such as the United States and members of the European Union continue to provide significant subsidies to their farmers. African producers, operating with limited state support, often struggle to compete with lower-priced imports.

“This is not simply a matter of competitiveness,” said an East African trade policy analyst. “It is a structural issue. You cannot ask countries to liberalize while others maintain protection through subsidies.”

The imbalance has implications for food security and rural incomes, particularly in economies where agriculture employs a large share of the population. Analysts warn that without adjustments, local production risks being displaced by imports, undermining long-term resilience.

Beyond agriculture, digital trade has emerged as a new frontier of concern. Proposals to maintain a global moratorium on tariffs for electronic transmissions—originally introduced to support the growth of e-commerce—are now being re-examined by several developing countries. African governments argue that such restrictions could limit their ability to generate revenue from a rapidly expanding digital economy.

“Digital trade is where future value lies,” said a Nairobi-based technology policy expert. “If African countries cannot tax or regulate this space, they risk locking themselves into consumption roles rather than production.”

At the same time, new standards linked to climate and sustainability are reshaping access to global markets. While African countries broadly support environmental goals, the cost of compliance—ranging from certification systems to traceability requirements—can be significant. Smaller exporters, in particular, face barriers to entry that may reduce their competitiveness.

ALSO READ: China files complaint with WTO against U.S. tariff hikes

Trade officials have cautioned that without adequate financial and technical support, such measures could function as indirect trade restrictions. “We support sustainability,” one negotiator said. “But the transition must be fair. Otherwise, it becomes exclusionary.”

These concerns are contributing to a broader reassessment of Africa’s trade strategy. The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) is increasingly seen as a platform to strengthen intra-African trade and reduce dependence on external markets. Currently, trade within Africa accounts for a relatively small share of total trade compared to regions such as Europe and Asia.

By expanding regional value chains, policymakers hope to shift from a model based on raw material exports to one focused on value addition and industrialization. This includes processing agricultural products, developing manufacturing capacity and investing in emerging sectors such as digital services.

“The question is no longer whether Africa should trade globally,” said a regional economist. “It is how Africa can trade on terms that support its development.”

Calls for reform are also focusing on the need for greater policy space within the WTO framework. African countries argue that they require flexibility to implement industrial policies, support emerging sectors and respond to domestic economic conditions—tools that were historically used by today’s advanced economies during their own development phases.

As negotiations continue, African delegations are expected to push for a more balanced approach that recognizes the diverse needs of member states. While there is no unified position across the continent, there is increasing alignment on key issues, including agriculture, digital trade and development policy.

For many observers, the outcome of these discussions will have long-term implications. The direction of global trade rules could determine whether African economies remain primarily suppliers of raw materials or transition toward more diversified and industrialized systems.

“The rules matter,” the East African analyst said. “They shape not just trade flows, but the structure of entire economies.”

As global trade continues to evolve, Africa’s challenge will be to engage with the system while ensuring that its development priorities remain central to the conversation.